0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿Ü»ó ÈÄ ½ºÆ®·¹½º Àå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ °¡»óÇö½ÇÄ¡·á ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ Ã¼°èÀû ¹®Çå°íÂû

A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Treatment Program on Patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Á¤½Å°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.119 ~ 140
KMID : 0607320210300020119
ÀÌ¿ø°æ ( Lee Won-Gyeong ) - Yonsei University College of Nursing

Á¶¿µ½Å ( Cho Young-Shin ) - Yonsei University College of Nursing
±èÈñÁ¤ ( Kim Hee-Jung ) - Yonsei University College of Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: The aims of this systematic review were to identify the study protocol of Virtual Reality Therapy (VRT) andreview the effect of VRT among patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Methods: This review followedthe guideline of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematicliterature search was conducted using 12 electronic databases including gray literature with no limit of publication year. Search terms included relevant terms regarding ¡°PTSD¡±, ¡°trauma¡±, and ¡°VRT¡±. Among 265 studies extracted throughPRISMA, 20 studies were selected and evaluated for quality assessment using the Risk of Bias tool of Cochrane¡¯scollaboration.

Results: The majority of the literature focused on combat veterans and war situations (95%).Usually,each session usually took 60~120 minutes of VRT in 10~20 sessions for 5~10 weeks. The VRT equipment andcontents were individually designed considering patients¡¯ traumatic experiences. Most of the studies reported thepositive effects associated to reduced levels of PTSD (80%) and related symptoms, such as, depression (45%) andanxiety (25%).

Conclusion: Based on our findings, further studies are required to evaluate VRT in people with PTSD,after improving study design and standardizing protocols.
KeyWords

Stress disorders, post-traumatic, Virtual reality exposure therapy, Systematic review as topic
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed